Freud was obsessed with guns and dicks?
You have been fooled by smoke and mirrors. The big picture is that both administrations kept consolidating wealth in fewer hands, both are hawks and interventionists militarily, and neither respect the constitution. And if the leadership of the Dems doesn't change, no matter how they wring their hands at Trump's draconian policies, none will be changed substantially. I've been watching this same bee ess show for thirty years.
Sounds are the things you hear when others are laughing at you - like now.
Meaning I read it. That's why I know it's the same old hogwash.
Panting like a dog. Pathetic.
It should be noted that even Richard Bauckham (Jesus and the Eyewitnesses, pp. 452-463) argues that both Papias and Polycarp were hearers of a separate ?elder? John, and not John the son of Zebedee. As James McGrath explains in ?Which John? The Elder, the Seer, and the Apostle,? by the time of Irenaeus in the late-2nd century CE, different figures in the early church named ?John??such as John the son of Zebedee, John of Patmos, and John the Presbyter (or, ?elder? John)?had become conflated in their identities. One of the reasons for differentiating John the Elder from John the son of Zebedee, McGrath explains, is the fact that ?Papias mentioned his efforts to find out what a variety of key figures, including John the apostle, said (using the past tense), and also what Aristion and John the Elder say (using the present tense).? This change in tense suggests that Papias is referring to John the son of Zebedee as a past figure, whereas the John the Elder was a subsequent figure, alive during his own day. Due to this ambiguity, and the general unreliability of the available sources, it is untenable that either Papias or Polycarp knew John the son of Zebedee, or any of the twelve disciples.
> You wait and see if there is any evidence for me being a murderer to decide. Just like god.
what does the last question have to do with the first questions ? Or more specifically , what is the main question that you are searching for , that would qualify , as being an answer ?
Like I said below the inclusion of "Liberty" is wrong. And it's missing "Opposed to change."
You speak as if these laws were imposed on an unwilling society. They were triggered by the emancipation of slaves and the backlash of the southern whites after losing the Civil War. Citizens were demanding these laws.
Yes they are. But what they are really saying is that their mystical entity called 'science' agrees with everything the invoker claims.
Yeah. They're annoying creatures. They rip up my garden all the time too.
Rev, evolution isn't short term change. Get your head out of your ass.
Oh, I understand quite a bit about constitutional law, actually.
Where are they giving up on natural selection?
930 / 13 = 71.......
I'm watching you too, sharkbait. :)
Awww (>?<) this is endearingly romantic!! ?
Wait until Jack and the Big Three hear about this. Shit is going to hit the fan.
I fully admit to concern myself more with the pattern of the dress than the whole underwear question.